01EVIDENCE LIBRARY
Observe the conversation
The export is organized into moments of initiation, response, disclosure, tension, repair, and withdrawal. We start with what happened, not what we assume it means.
SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Evidence first.
Interpretation second.
Syntonise uses published relationship research as a framework, then tests each interpretation against the behavior inside your conversation.
02PATTERN LIBRARY
Find repeated behavior
Signals are compared across ordinary exchanges, vulnerable moments, conflict, and reconnection. A single late reply never becomes a profile by itself.
03PROFILE MODEL
Build the profile
Repeated patterns are mapped across engagement, responsiveness, self-disclosure, and conflict regulation. Each finding carries an evidence trail and confidence level.
04DECISION MODEL
Choose the next move
Your goal, relationship stage, recent context, and profile are considered together. The recommendation explains why it fits and where the evidence is uncertain.
HOW THE LIBRARIES WORK TOGETHER
Research defines the signal.
Your context defines its meaning.
Study library
Peer-reviewed findings define which relationship behaviors are worth examining.
Evidence library
Relevant passages from the imported conversation support or contradict each signal.
Pattern library
Repeated combinations of signals form an interpretable communication profile.
SELECTED RESEARCH
The evidence behind the model.
These papers inform the framework. They do not prove intent, diagnose personality, or guarantee an outcome.
PARTNER RESPONSIVENESS
Responsiveness in Romantic Partners’ Interactions
Current Opinion in Psychology, 2023 · ElsevierReviews how understanding, validation, care, and listening shape intimacy across romantic interactions.
SELF-DISCLOSURE
Self-Disclosure and Perceived Partner Responsiveness
Frontiers in Psychology, 2021Shows how disclosure and perceived responsiveness interact across daily relationship experiences.
CONFLICT PATTERNS
Demand and Withdraw Behavior During Couple Conflict
Personal Relationships, 2011Links pressure-withdraw cycles with more negative emotion and poorer conflict resolution.
CONTEXT
Socioeconomic Context and Demand-Withdraw Communication
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2019Demonstrates why the same behavior should not be interpreted without its wider context.
START WITH THE DATA
Bring evidence to your next decision.
A clearer decision starts with the conversation itself.
Find my next move